Oppenhype

If you’re lucky enough to see a 70mm screening of Oppenheimer, I envy you. You won’t have to sit through twenty minutes of mostly bad trailers because the movie itself is already pushing the limits of the IMAX film size. Pictures of the 11-mile long reel look as if its been jury-rigged to fit existing projectors. Unfortunately, it would have taken my group longer to drive to the nearest 70mm screening of Oppenheimer than it takes to actually watch it, so we settled for the digital IMAX projection even though there is a local theater projecting it on 35mm film.

I’m glad we chose to see it big. I love big movies with big aspect ratios. Oppenheimer is certainly big, but it’s also bold. Director Christopher Nolan famously avoids CGI whenever possible, but the limitations of shooting this way are sometimes obvious in his previous films. Dunkirk features thousands of soldiers when there should be hundreds of thousands. The climactic shootout at the end of Tenet seemed more like a paintball match than a spectacle. What you get here is a three-hour picture that promises a big detonation and only shows it to you in glimpses reminiscent of what it must have been like to see it in person, carefully peeking out from behind cover miles way.

That’s not a complaint, it’s an admirable choice. There’s not a shred of war footage in the entire movie. The only violence we see is the violence in Oppenheimer’s head.

Was the real Oppenheimer capable of such empathy? Early on, we get our first indication that the character is going to be a challenging person to like when he injects cyanide into a professor’s apple over a classroom disagreement. Later, he’s disturbed by what he did and races back to the classroom to retrieve the poisoned apple moments before it unleashes unintended collateral damage. The historical accuracy of the scene is debatable, but I think it’s a peculiar coincidence that Alan Turing, another neurodivergent mastermind of the Allied victory in World War II, chose to kill himself with a cyanide-laced apple.

The film is so quickly paced (and dazzlingly scored) that even the audience with its benefit of hindsight is caught up in the scientists’ enthusiasm to build the mother of all weapons. By the time we remember the terrible implications, it’s too late, and the film abruptly cuts to Oppenheimer watching helplessly as two ominous crates ship out of Los Alamos. Soon after, Oppenheimer meets President Truman in person. Of the two men in this scene, one is portrayed as a tortured man who has a deep understanding of the very branch of science that eluded Einstein’s genius. The other is portrayed by Gary Oldman as a rankled sort with a high school education and the newfound power to cause unimaginable destruction. At the end of the scene, Truman ends up calling Oppenheimer a pussy when he doesn’t share his enthusiasm for the lives lost.

Famous actors with bit roles wander in and out of the movie at every other scene: Casey Affleck, Raimi Malek, Olivia Thirlby, James Remar, Tony Goldwyn, Matthew Modine to name only a few of these supporting-supporting actors. Josh Hartnett proves to be a surprisingly complex and capable actor. Macon Blair, the Jeremy Saulnier favorite who’s reportedly directing the Hollywood remake of The Toxic Avenger, levels up in this movie in a most impressive way as well. I’ve held Florence Pugh at arms length for some time now, but now I’m eager to reexamine her previous roles with a different eye. Saying the star power in this one is huge is an understatement.

Cillian Murphy deserves to be nominated for this movie, but my gut feeling is the Academy will overlook him as well as Emily Blunt. Robert Downey Jr. is just as deserving and I think he’ll probably win. I hope so. He’s never been better.

14 Years

When I created this blog, around 14 years ago, I also created my first Twitter account. Twitter was a service I used a lot more frequently in the wake of the total enshittification of Reddit (long story short: the sex creep of a CEO decided to kill 3rd party apps in an effort to appeal to investors… RIP RIF). Even as I belatedly embraced Twitter, it was clear the writing was on the wall: the service was in an uncontrollable death spiral. Now that the brilliant Elon Musk has rebranded it as X for absolutely no fucking reason whatsoever, I have deleted the app altogether.

It wasn’t easy letting go of Reddit. It was easier letting go of Twitter. It will be even easier to let go of Threads when the time inevitably comes.

So what are my options for social media? While I love decentralization in theory (that pipe dream has been thoroughly murdered by billionaires and investors), Mastodon requires its users to be a bit more technical than Twitter. I qualify as a techie, but I wasn’t on Reddit and Twitter to hang out exclusively with other techies… gods no. Bluesky is currently invite-only, but I haven’t gotten my invite yet. Threads is a clean (read: “featureless”) app, but I don’t care for The Zuckster cloning yet another service I used to like. (RIP Craigslist.)

All this turmoil has made one thing clear: blogs, though kind of passé these days, could be more important than ever… okay, I just realized I sound like Jude Law’s arrogant character in Contagion (“The blogosphere has the right to know!”). So maybe this is not so much of global importance, but it’s important to me. I need a home on the internet. And though this blog has fallen to shambles in recent years, it’s the best home I’ve got.

Speaking of homes in shambles, here’s a picture of my house after the mother of all trees fell on it during an Oklahoma storm:

As I write this, it’s been over two years since my last blog post here. The Goug’ Blog was supposed to be a place for me to write about books, comics, and the occasional video game, but mostly movies. I grew bored of that narrow-focused hobby and moved on to game development and making comics. Somehow it didn’t occur to me I could write about those hobbies (and others) here. I also get more than 280 characters to do it.

So, uh, welcome to my blog. It’s about everything.